When Parimutuel Race Track Wagering Got a Toe Hold In 1877 parimutuel wagering had a feeble test at Morris and Jerome Parks in New York, but the bookies quickly eliminated it. They remained to monopolize race course wagering until 1908 when parimutuel wagering secured a grip in this nation completely by mishap. The recently appointed Constable Scott Bullitt of Louisville, Kentucky, billed that bookmaking was a infraction of the legislation which it would certainly no much longer be tolerated in Jefferson Region where Churchill Downs was located. Mayor Grinstead of Louisville, a fierce foe of race course gambling, supported the Constable by endangering to send out city authorities to the track to impose the edict. It was a strike to Colonel Matt J. Winn, supervisor of Churchill Downs, because it meant no income from banking on the Kentucky Derby; but Mayor Grinstead and Constable Bullitt had met their suit. Colonel Winn analyzed the local laws and found that, although gambling was restricted, parimutuel wagering wasn’t. Consequently, on Kentucky Derby Day parimutuel wagering was conducted on a large range for the very first time in the Unified Specifies. MPO800
Colonel Winn’s experiment was so popular that the Maryland Jockey Club at Pimlico attempted the parimutuel system the next year side-by-side with the routine bookies running at the track. So effective was it that racing organizations started to adopt the system.
Under the supremacy of bookies, many of which were either unethical or downright deceitful, racing had reached such a reduced estate that its ultimate fatality appeared to be visible. Holiest guys that looked after racing as a sporting activity and dog breeders that were genuinely interested in improving the breed hailed the parimutuel system as the savior of racing. They became crusaders versus the bookies, using the parimutuel system as their sword of fight.